GraphQL vs gRPC vs REST: Choosing the Right API Style

I see teams paralyzed by this choice. Here is the decision matrix I use for enterprise architecture.

1. REST (JSON over HTTP)

Use when: Public facing APIs. Simple CRUD. When caching (CDN/Browser) is critical.
Pros: Universal support, simple, cacheable.
Cons: Over-fetching/under-fetching data. Loosely typed.

2. gRPC (Protobuf)

Use when: Internal Microservice-to-Microservice communication. High performance requirements. Streaming data.
Pros: Small binary payloads. Strong contracts. Code generation.
Cons: Not browser native (requires gRPC-Web). Harder to debug (binary).

3. GraphQL

Use when: Serving complex Frontends (Mobile/Web). Aggregating data from multiple backends. “Backends for Frontends” (BFF) pattern.
Pros: Client asks for exactly what it needs. Single endpoint.
Cons: “N+1” query performance issues. Caching is hard.

The Hybrid approach

My default stack in 2021: gRPC for internal service communication, exposed via a GraphQL gateway for the frontend apps. It gives you performance internally and flexibility externally.


Discover more from C4: Container, Code, Cloud & Context

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.